Jessica: | It’s Thursday, November 16, 2017. Welcome to another episode of our weekly program, News in Slow English! Greetings to all our listeners! I’m in the studio with my friend, Chris. Hi, Chris. |
Chris: | Hello, everyone! Hi, Jessica. |
Jessica: | In the first part of our program, we’re going to discuss current events. We will begin with the new European joint defense pact - PESCO. Next, we’ll talk about a new poll in Australia that shows overwhelming support for gay marriage. Then, we’ll have a conversation about the “Me Too” movement in which more than 1.7 million people in 85 countries have shared their experiences of sexual assault, abuse, or harassment. And finally, we’ll talk about a new video campaign in Poland to promote higher birthrates. |
Chris: | Excellent! All of these topics are very interesting! But we need to choose just one for Speaking Studio this week. |
Jessica: | Hmm… it’s not an easy choice! |
Chris: | I propose the “Me Too” story. I’m sure our audience will have thoughts to share on this topic. |
Jessica: | Good idea. You don’t need to have experienced an assault or harassment in order to participate in this conversation. |
Chris: | And as always, our Speaking Studio participants can choose any story from the program to discuss. The Featured Topic is just a suggestion. |
Jessica: | OK, let’s continue. The second part of our show will be dedicated to American culture and the English language. In the grammar section of our program, we’ll illustrate the use of today’s topic: Pronouns. And we’ll conclude our program with another English expression: “To blaze a trail / To be a trailblazer.” |
Chris: | Very good, Jessica. Let’s get started! |
Jessica: | Yes, Chris. There’s no time to waste. Let the show begin! |
Chris: | Hit it! |
-
IntroUpdate Required To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin .
Translate to: -
News Stories
-
European ministers sign joint defense pactUpdate Required To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin .
The normal speed version of the news story contains ONLY news narration, not dialog.
Translate to:European ministers sign joint defense pact
23 European Union countries signed an agreement on Monday to boost defense spending, jointly purchase and develop military equipment, and coordinate military missions. The initiative, known as Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO), is being hailed by supporters as the most significant step in European defense policy in decades.
The signing of the pact was motivated in part by United States President Donald Trump’s uncertain support for the NATO alliance and repeated calls for Europe to do more for its own security. Britain’s impending exit from the EU made it easier for the pact to be approved; Britain has opposed similar proposals in the past, saying that they would duplicate NATO. A primary goal of the PESCO agreement is to make European defense spending more efficient by coordinating arms purchases and eliminating duplicate purchases by individual countries.
Ireland, Denmark, Portugal, Malta, and Britain are the only five EU nations not to sign the pact, which could be formally launched next month. EU Commission chief spokesman Margaritis Schinas referenced the moon landings in describing the pact’s significance, calling it a “small step for Brussels, a giant leap for Europe.”Chris: This pact makes a lot of sense, Jessica. But… What does it mean for NATO? Jessica: That’s a good question, Chris -- it isn’t clear right now. Some analysts say that PESCO could undermine NATO, especially if their plans or priorities clash with each other. But many in Europe see this new pact as necessary, since it no longer sees the U.S. as a dependable ally. Chris: So, ironically, Trump saying over and over that Europe needs to do more to defend itself might have actually had that effect! Jessica: Yes, it does seem that way. But Trump’s ambivalence toward NATO is just one factor. Russia’s invasion of Crimea and its threat to the Baltics -- and the increase in terrorist attacks in Europe the past few years -- have convinced European leaders that they need to take control of their defense. Chris: This must be great news for Putin, no? Jessica: What do you mean? Chris: If he sees this European pact as making NATO weaker, it could encourage him to be even more aggressive. Jessica: Mmm… maybe. But if Europe makes a coordinated effort to strengthen its defenses and protect its borders, the effect could be just the opposite. Plus, if Russia were to threaten other countries and try to expand its power, our military would intervene ... hmm, I hope our military would intervene. -
Australians vote to legalize same-sex marriageUpdate Required To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin .
The normal speed version of the news story contains ONLY news narration, not dialog.
Translate to:Australians vote to legalize same-sex marriage
The results of an Australian national poll released yesterday show widespread support for legalizing gay marriage in the country. According to the results, published by the Australian Bureau of Statistics, 61 percent voted to allow same-sex marriage, while 38 percent voted against.
Following the results, a bill to change Australia’s current marriage law was introduced in the senate late yesterday. The bill will now be debated for amendments. Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull said his government aims to pass legislation to allow same-sex marriage by Christmas, adding that Australians had “voted yes for fairness, yes for commitment, yes for love, and now it is up to us… to get on with the job the Australian people have tasked us to do.”
The results follow a long campaign by activists for marriage equality, which is already law in most English-speaking countries. The marriage bill is expected to pass in parliament, though it includes religious protections for those who conduct marriages, but do not want to officiate same-sex ceremonies.Chris: 61%! That’s a sign of very strong support! For years, the majority of Australians have wanted to legalize same-sex marriage. It’s about time the law has caught up! Jessica: It is about time. Almost 80 percent of the population took part in the survey, and in every state and territory, the majority of people voted "yes." Chris: So… it’s almost certain to become law, right? With so many people supporting marriage equality, any politician that opposes legalizing it would certainly risk losing support. Jessica: Maybe. But it seems that even politicians who oppose same-sex marriage aren’t trying to stop it from becoming law. Instead, they’re trying to include certain exemptions in the law... Chris: Like what? Jessica: Some conservative politicians want to allow business owners that oppose same-sex marriage to refuse goods and services for weddings. At least one politician even proposed letting parents take their kids out of classes if any of the material ‘promoted’ same-sex marriage. Chris: Hmm. Well, the good news is that Malcolm Turnbull and the majority of Australian politicians support changing the law. Once it’s changed, it will be harder to go back. And this could also lead to other countries where same-sex marriage is illegal to take the same step. -
Featured Topic: As “Me Too” movement gains momentum, questions emerge about its lasting impactUpdate Required To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin .
The normal speed version of the news story contains ONLY news narration, not dialog.
Translate to:As “Me Too” movement gains momentum, questions emerge about its lasting impact
Since the hashtag #MeToo went viral one month ago, more than 1.7 million people in 85 countries have used it to share their experiences of sexual assault, abuse, or harassment. Last Sunday, hundreds participated in a Me Too Survivors’ march in Los Angeles. Yet despite the current momentum, many people are asking whether the movement will result in any long-term change.
The hashtag was first posted on Twitter on October 15th by American actress Alyssa Milano, shortly after allegations against film producer Harvey Weinstein went public. Since then, the list of directors, actors, and powerful men in other fields that have been accused of sexual harassment has quickly grown. Versions of the #MeToo movement have emerged in other countries including Italy, where women use the hashtag #QuellaVoltaChe (#TheTimeThat), and in France, where women have described their experiences with the hashtag #BalanceTonPorc (#DenounceYourPig).
Early steps have been taken to transform the #MeToo phenomenon into lasting change. In the U.S., for example, a social media campaign called #IWillSpeakUp that was launched last week encourages men to denounce instances of harassment when they see them.Chris: I’m very glad to see that this issue is getting so much attention. For too long, many people have considered sexual harassment to be almost “normal” behavior. Jessica: To me, the #MeToo movement has really shown the power of social media. It has united women around the world who share similar experiences. Even in Iran -- where women themselves are often blamed when they’re sexually harassed or assaulted -- women have shared their stories. Chris: People should remember that even though women have been the victims in most cases, men have been victims, too. In Hollywood, for example, men sexually abusing younger men and boys is a huge problem. Jessica: So many of these incidents are about power -- when people are in positions of power -- like a director or a famous actor -- they sometimes abuse it. And the people that they target are most often women -- but, yes, men are victims, too... Chris: Now the question is: What happens next? It’s great to see the #IWillSpeakUp campaign and similar ones on Facebook and Twitter. But the men who are participating are probably the ones who ALREADY see sexual harassment and assault against women as a problem. Jessica: So… you’re saying that things won’t really change? Chris: No, I’m not saying that. But, it will take time for EVERYONE to see sexual harassment as a problem, and not as harmless behavior.. The #MeToo movement has only been around for a month… real change will take years. -
Poles encouraged to “breed like rabbits” in new video campaignUpdate Required To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin .
The normal speed version of the news story contains ONLY news narration, not dialog.
Translate to:Poles encouraged to “breed like rabbits” in new video campaign
Poland’s government is suggesting a solution for the country’s shrinking population. Two new videos produced by the country’s Ministry of Health praise rabbits for producing many offspring -- and urge young citizens to follow the rabbits’ example.
The videos are the latest step that the conservative government has taken to try to boost the country’s birth rate since it took power in late 2015. It also pays 500 złoty ($137.50) per child per month to families with more than one child. According to Eurostat, the European Union’s statistical office, Poland’s population -- currently around 38 million -- will decrease by almost 6 percent by 2040, and by 24 percent by 2080.
In the new videos, rabbits eat lettuce and carrots while a narrator reveals the animals’ secrets to having large families: exercise, a healthy diet, little stress, and avoidance of alcohol. Viewers are advised to follow this example if they want to become parents. The Polish government is said to have invested almost 3 million złoty ($833,947) into the campaign.Chris: Who thought this was a good idea? Jessica: You mean… suggesting that people breed like rabbits? Chris: Yes. It’s completely offensive and in bad taste. Jessica: I don’t think the government meant it to be offensive, Chris. They’ve said that they thought it would be a fun way to discuss the issue, which will become a serious problem unless things change. The government also said it was seeking to raise public awareness of the issue in a way that “did not offend anyone and was not vulgar.” Chris: Hmm. If the government was really concerned about a shrinking population, maybe it could have found better ways to try to fix the problem. Jessica: Like...? Chris: Well, the government recently cut funding for in vitro fertilization (IVF). Critics of the videos have said that all the money the government spent on them could have been spent on IVF instead. Jessica: How ironic! People who want to have children, but can’t, might now have even more difficulty having them…
-
-
Grammar
-
TranscriptUpdate Required To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin .
Translate to:Pronouns
Chris: Guess what I did this weekend? Jessica: What? Chris: I spent hours and hours at a hardware store trying to reproduce the color of the Golden Gate bridge, but we just couldn’t get it right. The salesperson said I needed to travel to San Francisco and get a paint sample. Jessica: What do you need the color for? Chris: For my friend. He’s painting his house this weekend and I’m going to help. Jessica: Well, let me save you some time. It’s “International Orange.” Chris: What? The Golden Gate Bridge is clearly red, not orange. Jessica: It looks red, but it’s actually called “International Orange.” It’s very popular in California. They use it for everything. Chris: They are really very proud of their bridge. I think it’s the most gorgeous bridge in the world. Jessica: It is certainly the most photographed, and rightfully so. But there are many other beautiful bridges in the world. I have a soft spot for Tower Bridge in London, and Brooklyn Bridge in New York. Chris: And there’s the Pont Neuf in Paris, or the Charles Bridge in Prague. They’re also picturesque, but the Golden Gate Bridge is immediately recognizable. No one ever mistakes it. It’s the color, I’m telling you. Jessica: We owe the genius color choice to Irving Morrow, one of the architects of the bridge. He thought the color would look glorious next to the backdrop of the beautiful California landscape. Chris: It also makes it quite visible in the famous San Francisco fog. Jessica: And the funny thing is, it wasn’t even supposed to be permanent. The Navy wanted black and yellow stripes for the visibility. The Army wanted red and white stripes. International Orange was the color of the primer, but Morrow liked it so much that he advocated to keep it that way. Chris: Black and yellow stripes? Sheesh, no wonder the red color stuck! Jessica: Orange! International orange! Chris: Anyway, there could not be a better setting for such a bridge. The gorgeous city of San Francisco on one side, the beautiful mountains of Marin County on the other. It is just breathtaking. Jessica: Did you know the first design for the bridge by Joseph Strauss was universally rejected? He had to go back to the drawing board. Chris: I’m glad he did! The Golden Gate bridge was a marvel of engineering. It was dubbed “The bridge that could not be built” because the span it had to cover was enormous, and when it was finally completed in 1937, it was the longest bridge in the world. Jessica: Did you also know that the Golden Gate had the best safety record for a construction project for that time? Chris: That’s impressive. Jessica: Strauss put in an innovative safety net under the bridge and required all workers to wear helmets. 19 workers were saved by that net. Chris: Wow. Jessica: And do you know what Strauss said when asked how long the bridge would last? Chris: No. Jessica: He said, “forever.” -
LessonTranslate to:
Pronouns
A pronoun is a word or phrase that is substituted for a noun whose identity has already been established. We use pronouns so we don’t have to keep repeating nouns and avoid sounding repetitive. Erin woke up early. She is tired today. sounds far less repetitive than Erin woke up early. Erin is tired today.
I. First and Second Person Pronouns: I, You, and We
I used used when you are referring to yourself as the speaker or writer. You is used when referring directly to a listener or reader.
I am the teacher. You are the student.
‘I’ refers to the writer. ‘You’ refers to the reader.
We is used to refer to a group that the speaker or writer belongs to. The listener or reader may or may not be included in the group.
We will start class in five minutes.
‘We’ refers to the teacher (the speaker) and the students.
II. He, She, It, and They
Most, but not all, pronouns have an antecedent which the pronoun later replaces.
Brenda went to Los Angeles. She will be back on Monday.
Brenda is the antecedent. ‘She’ is the pronoun.
The pronoun reflects the gender of the noun it is replacing. He is used when referring to a man, she is used when referring to a woman, it is used when referring to a place or an object, and they is used when referring to more than one person.
Jared went to work early
so he could leave after lunch.
‘He’ refers to Jared.
Natalie called out sick.
She won’t be in the office today.
‘She’ refers to Natalie.
Sarah bought a new car.
It is a Toyota.
‘It’ refers to the car.
John and Maria are coming over to dinner.
They will be here in an hour.
‘They’ refers to John and Maria.
Animals are usually referred to as it. However, if there is a personal relationship with the animal, such as a pet, and/or the gender is known, use he or she.
Did you see that horse? It ran right in front of the car!
‘It’ is used because there is no relationship
between the speaker and the horse.
My pet cat’s name is Hazel. She is almost seven years old.
‘She’ is used because there is a personal relationship
between the speaker and the cat.
III. The Dummy Subject
We use it as an empty pronoun, or a dummy subject, if there is no other pronoun to use as a subject. This is often used when referring to the weather or time.
It was past midnight when I got home.
It is so nice to go out to dinner.
I can’t believe it is raining again.
-
-
Expressions
-
TranscriptUpdate Required To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin .
Translate to:To blaze a trail / To be a trailblazer
Jessica: Chris, I have a question for you. Would you say that people should take iconic works literally or do you think they are open to interpretation? Chris: Hmm… I know this is a trick question. Are you talking about the Bible? Jessica: No. Chris: The Constitution of the United States? Jessica: Actually, the national anthem! Chris: Oh! But... what is there to interpret? The anthem is the anthem, isn’t it? Jessica: I’m talking about musical interpretation! I bet you’re not surprised when you hear the anthem performed in a unique, modern style by a famous singer. This has not always been the case, though. Someone had to blaze a trail. Chris: Care to explain? Jessica: Well, before the 1960s, the anthem was generally performed by popular musicians of stage and screen, or talented members of the military, and always, always in a very traditional way. But then, in 1968, a Puerto Rican pop star named José Feliciano was asked to sing The Star Spangled Banner before one of the games of the World Series of baseball. Chris: Yeah, the St. Louis Cardinals played the Detroit Tigers! The Tigers won! It was a historic event! Jessica: It was also historic because of José Feliciano’s trailblazing performance. Picture it: a young guy wearing sunglasses, sitting on a stool, playing his acoustic guitar and singing a Latin jazz-infused version of the national anthem! Chris: People must have been puzzled. Jessica: Puzzled? Definitely! Some liked it, but many were outraged! Feliciano was even booed by some of the fans. Phones lit up with angry calls from around the country. People were taking off their shoes and throwing them at their television screens! Chris: Wow! Though I can understand why some felt it was disrespectful. It was 1968! The country was torn apart over America’s involvement in Vietnam. I bet some people perceived Feliciano's anthem as a protest. Jessica: But it wasn’t. Feliciano insisted it was the exact opposite. He said: "I did it to show my appreciation to America for what they had done for me. I love this country." Chris: I see… He wasn’t protesting or being disrespectful. Jessica: Not at all. He was just the first to try it, and that’s what threw people off. Chris: He really did blaze a trail! Jessica: Feliciano's improvisation on the anthem opened the door for lots of other people to play their own interpretation of the anthem. Chris: Yeah! Like Jimi Hendrix with his solo guitar performance of the national anthem at Woodstock in 1969. Jessica: Another trailblazing performance. Chris: There are so many great examples, with each artist bringing a new style. Marvin Gaye at the NBA All Star Game in 1983, Garth Brooks, Billy Joel... Jessica: Beyoncé. Lady Gaga. And, of course, Whitney Houston's iconic performance in 1991, at the height of the first Gulf War, complete with a flyover of four F-16 fighter jets. Chris: Nowadays we don’t see anything controversial about an original interpretation of our national anthem. In fact, we’ve come to expect them! Jessica: So, back to the question I asked you earlier – should we take iconic works literally or are we free to interpret them? Chris: I don’t know about all iconic works, that’s too philosophical for me. But I will say this about the anthem: If you’re a singer, go ahead and be bold, blaze a trail, but please, stay on key. -
LessonTranslate to:
To blaze a trail / To be a trailblazer
The phrase blaze a trail conjures up images of a brave individual moving forward into unknown or even perilous territory and clearing the path for others to follow. The idiom is used to describe the actions of pioneers in every field of work or expression; from science to the arts. A trailblazer is the first person to do something or make a discovery, and enables or inspires other people to do the same.
As you might imagine, blazing a trail comes from a very common practice in hiking and forest management. However, contrary to our expectations of the word “blaze”, it has nothing to do with setting something on fire. Blazing actually refers to the action of leaving small marks on trees so that people can easily follow a trail through the forest. Traditionally, blazing involves cutting a small notch in the bark of a tree; that notch is a “blaze”. Therefore, many pioneers and explorers were literally trailblazers, but nowadays we use the term figuratively to talk about artists with bold new expressions, scientists who defy tradition, politicians to challenge the status quo, etc…
The expression most likely originated in the United States. The practice of blazing trees has been well known and documented for hundreds of years, but the earliest recorded usage of “blaze a trail” was in the Montana newspaper, The Helena Independent, in 1883. In that case the phrase was used literally. It is unclear how or when the idiom evolved into the figurative meaning we use today, but it’s accurate to say that someone, somewhere blazed the trail when they used it as a metaphor for the first time.
Example 1:
As the first woman elected mayor in her city’s history, she is blazing the trail for other local women to enter politics.
Example 2:
With his revolutionary ideas about the universe, Stephen Hawking is a trailblazer in the field of theoretical physics.
Example 3:
In places like Silicon Valley, people love to call themselves trailblazers. But with thousands of innovators competing to develop the next great technology that will change the world, only a few of them can realistically make that bold claim.
-
-
Pronunciation
Let's practice pronunciation on few short phrases from today's episode. Listen carefully how the native speaker pronounces each sentence. Follow the intonations in each sentence. When you are ready, record one paragraph at a time with your own voice and then compare your pronunciation and intonations to the native speaker's:
Please allow the use of the microphoneReady to record 00:08Update Required To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin .
-
Quizzes
-
Quiz 1Textfield background will turn green if your answer is correct, and red if the answer is incorrectTranslate to:
In the box, type the correct pronoun for the noun in parenthesis.
- is blue. (my car)
- I don’t think can afford to take another vacation so soon. (the speaker and listener)
- is taking a nap. (my baby daughter)
- What do think I should do? (the listener)
- is going to college out in Los Angeles. (John)
- is in the backyard again. (the fox)
- are watching the baseball game. (my sister and I)
- I dropped my phone on the sidewalk and broke. (my phone)
- Can pick up some groceries? (the reader/listener)
- will order a pizza when I get home. (the speaker)
-
Quiz 2Textfield background will turn green if your answer is correct, and red if the answer is incorrectTranslate to:
Type the correct pronoun in the box for the noun the given.
- siblings
- computers
- the weather
- school
- brothers
- Father
- Chris and I
- a mouse
- Los Angeles
- wife
-